Taking Pleasure In the Collapse of the Conservative Party? It's Understandable – But Totally Incorrect
On various occasions when Conservative leaders have sounded almost sensible superficially – and different periods where they have come across as wildly irrational, yet continued to be cherished by party loyalists. We are not in either of those times. One prominent Conservative failed to inspire attendees when she spoke at her conference, even as she presented the red meat of anti-immigration sentiment she believed they wanted.
This wasn't primarily that they’d all awakened with a fresh awareness of humanity; rather they lacked faith she’d ever be equipped to follow through. In practice, an imitation. The party dislikes such approaches. One senior Conservative reportedly described it as a “themed procession”: boisterous, animated, but ultimately a goodbye.
What Next for the Group With a Decent Case to Make for Itself as the Most Historically Successful Political Organization in History?
Certain members are taking renewed consideration at a particular MP, who was a definite refusal at the start of the night – but as things conclude, and rivals has departed. Others are creating a interest around a newer MP, a 34-year-old MP of the newest members, who looks like a countryside-based politician while saturating her online profiles with immigration-critical posts.
Is she poised as the leader to challenge opposition forces, now outpolling the Conservatives by a significant margin? Does a term exist for beating your rivals by becoming exactly like them? Moreover, should one not exist, maybe we can use an expression from martial arts?
When Finding Satisfaction In These Developments, in a Schadenfreude Way, in a Just-Deserts Way, One Can See Why – But Totally Misguided
One need not consider overseas examples to know this, or consult Daniel Ziblatt’s seminal 2017 book, the historical examination: every one of your synapses is screaming it. Centrist right-wing parties is the crucial barrier resisting the extremist factions.
His research conclusion is that political systems endure by keeping the “propertied and powerful” happy. I’m not wild about it as an fundamental rule. It seems as though we’ve been catering to the propertied and powerful over generations, at the expense of other citizens, and they rarely appear quite happy enough to cease desiring to reduce support out of disability benefits.
However, his study goes beyond conjecture, it’s an comprehensive document review into the pre-Nazi German National People’s Party during the pre-war period (along with the British Conservatives circa 1906). When the mainstream right becomes uncertain, when it starts to pursue the terminology and gesture-based policies of the extremist elements, it cedes the steering wheel.
Previous Instances Showed Some of This During the Brexit Years
Boris Johnson aligning with Steve Bannon was one particularly egregious example – but extremist sympathies has become so obvious now as to overshadow all remaining Conservative messages. Whatever became of the traditional Tories, who prize continuity, tradition, legal frameworks, the UK reputation on the global scene?
Why have we lost the modernisers, who defined the country in terms of economic engines, not powder kegs? To be clear, I didn't particularly support both groups as well, but it’s absolutely striking how these ideologies – the one nation Tory, the Cameroonian Conservative – have been eliminated, superseded by ongoing scapegoating: of immigrants, religious groups, welfare recipients and activists.
Appear at Podiums to Music That Sounds Like the Opening Credits to the Television Drama
And talk about positions they oppose. They characterize protests by elderly peace activists as “festivals of animosity” and display banners – British flags, English symbols, all objects bearing a splash of matadorial colour – as an direct confrontation to anyone who doesn’t think that complete national identity is the ultimate achievement a human can aspire to.
We observe an absence of any natural braking system, that prompts reflection with core principles, their historical context, their stated objectives. Any stick the political figure presents to them, they pursue. Therefore, no, it isn't enjoyable to see their disintegration. They’re taking social cohesion along in their decline.